Board Denies Proposed Relicensing of Duke Energy's Dams on the Catawba-Wateree River
07.09.2009 – Columbia, SC��" The S.C. Board of Health and Environmental Control today denied Duke Energy LLC's requested certification for decreased water flows into South Carolina from hydroelectric plants on the Catawba-Wateree River overriding the previous proposed approval by the S.C. Department of Health and Environmental Control for the reasons raised by the Southern Environmental Law Center on behalf of the S.C. Coastal Conservation League and American Rivers.
The groups challenged DHEC's proposed approval of excessively low water flows into South Carolina from Duke Energy's hydroelectric plants in the heavily dammed Catawba-Wateree River because the dams would have released water in flows that were routinely too low to sustain the state's aquatic habitat and threatened efforts to protect the federally-endangered shortnose sturgeon native to the Catawba-Wateree River.
In its proposal, Duke Energy offered land conservation and money in exchange for approval of the low and variable water flows. SELC attorneys argued that such out-of-kind mitigation would not have replaced the river flow being lost and could not compensate for the violations of water quality standards and adverse impacts to South Carolina aquatic life and recreation caused by the low water flows.
In June 2009, DHEC gave notice of its intent to certify under section 401 of the Clean Water Act that Duke's proposed operation of five dams along the river in South Carolina would not violate the state's water quality standards despite concerns.
If allowed, the proposed DHEC certification would have conflicted with actions by South Carolina Attorney General Henry McMaster who also testified at today's hearing. McMaster petitioned the U.S. Supreme Court to equitably allocate water in the Catawba River between North Carolina and South Carolina.
The Southern Environmental Law Center represented the South Carolina Coastal Conservation League and American Rivers in this challenge to DHEC's proposed water quality certification before the board.
###
Note to editors: Photograph and illustrations of shortnose sturgeon are available at http://digitalrepository.fws.gov/index.php
Southern Environmental Law Center
The Southern Environmental Law Center is the only regional nonprofit using the power of the law to protect the health and environment of the Southeast (Virginia, Tennessee, North and South Carolina, Georgia, and Alabama). Founded in 1986, SELC's team of 40 legal experts represent more than 100 partner groups on issues of climate change and energy, air and water quality, forests, the coast and wetlands, transportation, and land use.
WEB: www.SouthernEnvironment.org
FACEBOOK: http://www.fanofselc.org
TWITTER: http://www.twitter.com/selc_org
- Twitter Pitch
- SC board denies proposed relicensing of Duke Energy's dams on the Catawba-Wateree River that spans NC & SC -SELC
- Tweet It!
- News Facts
-
- The S.C. Board of Health and Environmental Control today denied Duke Energy LLC’s requested certification for decreased water flows into South Carolina from hydroelectric plants on the Catawba-Wateree River overriding the previous proposed approval by the DHEC for the reasons raised by the Southern Environmental Law Center on behalf of the S.C. Coastal Conservation League and American Rivers.
- The groups challenged DHEC’s proposed approval of excessively low water flows into South Carolina from Duke Energy’s hydroelectric plants in the heavily dammed Catawba-Wateree River because the dams would have released water in flows that were routinely too low to sustain the state’s aquatic habitat and threatened efforts to protect the federally-endangered shortnose sturgeon native to the Catawba-Wateree River.
- SELC attorneys argued that out-of-kind mitigation would not have replaced the river flow being lost and could not compensate for the violations of water quality standards and adverse impacts to South Carolina aquatic life and recreation caused by the low water flows.
- If allowed, the proposed DHEC certification would have conflicted with actions by South Carolina Attorney General Henry McMaster who also testified at today’s hearing.
- In June 2009, DHEC gave notice of its intent to certify under section 401 of the Clean Water Act that Duke’s proposed operation of five dams along the river in South Carolina would not violate the state’s water quality standards despite concerns.
- Resource Links
- Sturgeon photos
- Tags
- SELC, carolina, water, river flow, water war, dam, Duke, fish, sturgeon, aquatic, wildlife, catawba, wateree, SC, NC, Supreme Court, McMaster, DHEC, southern, environmental law, environment, dam flow, wildlife
- Share via
- More Southern Environmental Law Center News
- World experts on uranium mining featured at Richmond forum
- Conservation Groups Seek Positive Outcomes from Proposed Rules for Off-Road Vehicles within National Park
- Army Corps Fails to Protect 500 Acres of S.C. Wetlands Near Charleston
- Dominion Energy Efficiency Plan a Good Start, But Short-Changes Businesses and Low-Income Customers
-
Subscribe
PitchEngine™ is not responsible or liable for the accuracy, validity or quality of this content. Users are solely responsible for the facts and accuracy of all information posted and shared on the Site. PitchEngine reserves the right to reject or hold social media releases that it deems not newsworthy in its judgment, at any time.
Limitation of Liability - In no event will PitchEngine be liable for any direct, indirect, incidental, special, exemplary or consequential damages (Including, but not limited to, damages for loss of business profits, business interruption, loss of programs or information, and the like). This disclaimer of liability applies to any damages or injury under any cause of action, including, without limitation, those caused by any failure of performance, error, omission, interruption, deletion, defect, delay in operation or transmission, computer virus or bug, communication line failure, theft, destruction or alteration of or unauthorized access to the Site or materials on the Site.
© Copyright 2009 PitchEngine, Inc.
Download vCards
Ask a Question or Add Your Comment